In R v. Kingston, what crime did the accused commit against the boy?

In R v. Kingston, the crime committed by the accused against the boy is classified as sexual assault. The case is notably significant in exploring the intersection of intent and culpability, particularly in instances where the accused may have been intoxicated or influenced by drugs. It was determined that despite the accused’s impaired state, he still engaged in acts that constituted sexual assault, underscoring the legal principles surrounding consent and accountability in such offenses. This case illustrates that the presence of intoxication does not absolve an individual from liability when they engage in sexually inappropriate behavior, especially against a minor. The focus on the nature of the act and the vulnerable status of the victim confirms the gravity of the offense and the rationale behind labeling it as sexual assault.