What does the defense of necessity include according to the guidelines presented?

The defense of necessity is recognized in Irish criminal law as justifying certain actions that may otherwise be criminal when those actions are performed to prevent a greater harm. The concept revolves around the idea that a person is compelled to act in a way that would usually be considered unlawful to avert a more significant threat or danger.

In this context, the defense of property specifically aligns with the principles of necessity, as it permits an individual to take certain actions to protect their property from immediate harm or danger. For example, if someone is faced with the threat of immediate damage to their belongings, they might argue that their actions to prevent this harm were necessary, thus invoking the defense of necessity.

Other options, while they represent various aspects of legal rights and disputes, do not align with the legal framework surrounding necessity. Retaliation in personal disputes typically falls under the purview of justifiable defenses or privileges but does not meet the requirement of necessity, which focuses on preventing greater harm rather than retribution. Enforcement of legal rights and seeking compensation for damages relate more to civil claims and do not pertain directly to the justification of criminal actions under the necessity defense.