What principle did Collins v. Wilcock (1984) establish regarding physical contacts in ordinary life?

Collins v. Wilcock (1984) established the principle that many physical contacts are impliedly consented to in ordinary life. This case illustrates that not every instance of physical contact is considered an assault; instead, everyday interactions often involve an assumption of consent. Such consent is generally understood in social contexts where physical contact occurs—like a friendly pat on the back or brushing past someone in a crowded space.

The ruling emphasizes that in social interactions, individuals accept a certain degree of physical contact as part of everyday life. Therefore, unless the contact is clearly unwanted or excessive, it is usually seen as acceptable and falling under this implied consent. This principle helps to delineate acceptable behavior in social situations from actions that may constitute assault when a person does not consent to physical interference.

Consequently, while other options suggest that all contacts are either inherently harmful or require explicit consent, the ruling from Collins v. Wilcock recognizes the nuanced nature of social interactions where implied consent is customary and necessary for maintaining social order.