What recommendation did the Law Reform Commission make in 1995 regarding self-induced intoxication?

The recommendation made by the Law Reform Commission in 1995 regarding self-induced intoxication was that it should afford no defense to any charge. This aligns with the principle that individuals should be responsible for their actions, particularly when they willingly choose to consume intoxicating substances. The rationale behind this recommendation is based on the idea that allowing a defense of self-induced intoxication could undermine the legal accountability of individuals, particularly in serious offenses where intent or recklessness is a key element.

By asserting that self-induced intoxication does not provide a defense, the Commission aimed to maintain certain standards of personal responsibility and to prevent potential abuse of the legal system where individuals could escape liability simply by claiming they were intoxicated at the time of the offense. This perspective upholds the notion that individuals cannot use their voluntary choices as a shield against the consequences of criminal behavior.

In contrast, the other suggestions presented do not reflect this stance. For instance, arguing that it should be a complete defense would undermine the legal principles of responsibility, while limiting it to minor offenses or considering it based on circumstances could lead to inconsistencies in the application of the law, potentially complicating the judicial process and judgment in criminal cases.