What type of sexual activity was central to the case of R v. Brown (1994)?

The case of R v. Brown (1994) involved a group of men who engaged in consensual sado-masochistic sexual practices, which was the central issue that the House of Lords had to determine. The activities in question included a variety of consensual acts that were conducted in private and involved physical harm, yet were performed with the consent of all parties involved.

The ruling focused on whether consensual acts of this nature should be criminalized under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The House of Lords ultimately decided that the state had an interest in the prevention of harm, even if it was consensual, and thus upheld the convictions. This case is significant in discussions around consent, personal autonomy, and the limits of legal intervention in private lives.

In contrast, the other types of sexual activity mentioned do not reflect the specific circumstances and legal considerations of this landmark case. Each option presents a different context, but only the consensual sado-masochistic sexual practices are central to the legal issues and debates raised in R v. Brown.