What was the outcome of the trial regarding duress in DPP v. Walsh and Conneely?

The correct response indicates that duress did not survive the enactment of the Constitution in the context of the trial in DPP v. Walsh and Conneely. This underscores a significant legal principle regarding the defense of duress in Irish law. In this case, the court examined how the defense of duress operates under the framework established by the Constitution. The ruling suggests that while duress can be a defense in certain circumstances, its applicability is constrained by constitutional provisions and interpretations, which can diminish the ability of an accused to rely on such a defense.

In discussions of constitutional law, particularly in relation to criminal defenses, understanding how constitutional enactments influence the interpretation of existing legal defenses is crucial. The outcome in this case reflects the broader legal landscape where the principles of legality and constitutional rights intersect, highlighting the limitations placed on certain defenses by constitutional law.

This context is important for those studying Irish criminal law, as it illustrates the judicial balancing act between individual rights and public policy reflected in the Constitution.